|
Promotions
Firstly,
we congratulate Naledi Roberts on producing a top quality
journal under difficult circumstances associated with many
sideline problems. We are proud of this publication, and we are
especially grateful to her for the many hours of personal time
which she has put into this.
Secondly, we were at NAMPO, but by all accounts, displaying from
a “third league” position. Given that this is the pre-eminent
agricultural show in the country, we intend to budget next year
for a stand, and a promotion event equal to and better than that
of other breed societies. We believe we owe this to our cattle,
and our members.
Training
Our annual inspections have been well planned and are
proceeding. We aim to deal with the ongoing issue of inspector
training in the latter part of the year. In the meantime, we
have had a number of potential junior inspectors participating
in the process. Once signed off, these candidates will be a
valuable addition
to our cadre of inspectors nationally. Formative plans are in
place to hold an inspectors’ conference later in the year, which
will deal further with the issue of inspector training, but also
the issue of ensuring a consistent approach to judging breed
standards. This is expected to take the place of the senior
inspectors’ meeting which to date has coincided with the AGM.
Member, and particularly new member training is our current
priority, given the ongoing growth in society membership. Many
of our new members are new to cattle farming, many are not full
time farmers, and many are not familiar with stud administration
and society policies and procedures. Dr Piet Prinsloo has kindly
agreed to co-ordinate a project aimed at producing a member
training manual which it is planned, will be available for use
by the end of July. He will, where necessary, network with
breeders, inspectors, and associated expertise in pursuing this
initiative. This project will promote a consistent approach to
member training at society and club level.
Clubs
Whilst
constitutional changes to recognize the existence of clubs were
signed off at the AGM in November last year, there remains no
coherent logic to the organization of clubs, their geographic
representivity, their roles, or their interface with the
society. The club system is critical to the interface with
members regionally, to the promotion of the breed, and to
inspection and training initiatives. We therefore need to make
some sense of this structure, and to this end, we propose to
hold a “bosberaad” involving club and society representatives in
the latter part of the year. We will confirm dates and venues in
due course.
On a related subject, we are pleased to advise the formation of
the Kalahari Nguni Telers as of 3 April 2007. To quote their
objective:
“ Ons doel is om die Nguni as ras te bevorder – stoet en veral
kommersieel – onder ekstensiewe toestande. Alles wat ons beoog
sal in samewerking en binne die grondwet van die Nguni
Beesttelersgenootskap wees”.
They plan their first sale on 12
March 2008. Marguerite Fyfer is the contact person (082 935
0216). We welcome this as an initiative that creates yet another
Nguni footprint on the map of South Africa.
Communications
We are continuing to refine the
society website. It is not perfect yet, but we are getting
there. Of note here, is the fact that office resources and
workload do not permit timeous interaction with the web
administrator on the updating of ongoing events (sales and sales
results, for example). We will be working on this with Giel and
the Finance and Admin Subcommittee.
A new component to the website will be a “classified” section
where members can post adverts, either buying or selling. The
charge per advert will be R100-00 for one month’s posting on the
site.
We are reviewing the function of the quarterly newsletter in
relation to the news brief updates. We think that this should be
more about regional and club news, and other matters of
interest, rather than society business. And perhaps, this should
be put together and go out when there is sufficient material of
interest, and not just as a matter of course.
We would welcome feedback from members on our communication
approach, since it is only with this feedback that we can meet
our service to member’s objectives.
Finance and Administration
As per the budget which Giel put to our AGM in November, our
finances are in good order. However, our breed and membership
profile is changing all the time, and we need to factor this
into our planning for the future. We need to spend more money on
office resources, and more money on breed promotion. This is
necessary, we believe, if we are to promote the sustainability
of Nguni cattle prices, and the development of a viable Nguni
beef market.
Our per capita fee (which remains amongst the
lowest) will need to be reviewed, and will be put to the next
AGM.
Some Other Issues
Member Profile
We need to get a better understanding of our membership profile,
their circumstances, and their geographic localities.
Accordingly, we have compiled a questionnaire which we would
request that you complete and return to the office. This will be
attached to this news brief. For those of you who communicate
via email with the society, this can be done by return email.
Alternatively, please post your return to us as soon as
possible.
Sales and
Transfers
It is important
to remind members that the buying and selling of registered
cattle takes on different connotations, depending on how the
sale transacts. A sale under the auspices of the Nguni Cattle
Breeders’ Society ensures the fact that the animals are
registered, meet the breed standards, and that the associated
documentation will be forthcoming.
If you choose to buy cattle “off the farm”, please be aware of
the consequences. The society can not be held responsible, nor
take remedial action where disputes might occur under these
circumstances, particularly with regard to the status of
animals.
Branding
Council has
confirmed that branding remains the official means of permanent
identification of registered animals. Arising out of the
technical subcommittee meeting is the issue of standardization
of branding procedure. To date, it has been acceptable to brand
either side of the rump with the sequence (top to bottom), HDM,
year, sequence number, or HDM, sequence number,
year.
To achieve consensus on this matter, we will decide by
referendum via the member profile questionnaire as to how this
will be standardized for the future. So please take your survey
questionnaire seriously.
Technical
Here we deal
with some crunchy stuff.
Primarily, it is important to note that the by-laws are being
reviewed and re-written. Accordingly, decisions taken in the
Technical Subcommittee were reviewed by Council and approved in
principle subject to the final approval by council of the
completed submission of the amended by-laws. So this is still
work in progress, but it is important for members to be advised
of developments. These are proposed to be as follows:
- On
inspection, a Lid Kat sample will be taken from bulls. Given
the availability of storage logistics, this will be a phased
approach, beginning in the northern region.
- Criteria
for transfer of a first registration (FR) animal:
- Bulls: 48
months and 20 progeny of whom 50% pass inspection
- Females:
One ICP of no more than 550 days
- Inspection
minimum ages:
- Bulls:
730 days
- Female:
365 days
- Birth
notification rules are such that:
- Maximum
period allowed is now increased to 210 days (weaning time)
- Current
penalty applies after 90 days
- No late
notifications post 210 days will be permitted
-
Reinstatement of bulls: Further to the decision of the AGM in
November last year, it is confirmed that the cost of bull
reinstatement is R500-00
Dr Hans van der
Pyperkamp has compiled
some quality (user friendly) documents on bio-security and
cattle health management. These were discussed at the
subcommittee meeting, and with his permission, we intend to
communicate these to members.
Council – Strategic Business
Of strategic importance to the breed, the society, and marketing
opportunities, concerns public sector, NGO and institutional
initiatives to reintroduce Nguni cattle into communal and
emerging farmer herds. It is in our long term interests that
such projects be strongly supported at society and club level.
This issue was extensively discussed in the council meeting, and
included a briefing by Mr Mzeleni of Fort Hare, and Vernon
Sparks of the East Cape Club on developments with the Norway
Project. Other club representatives also reported on progress in
other provinces.
-
Important elements of society and
club driven support programmes would include:
-
Facilitating the procurement of
cattle on a basis fair to breeders and to project and farmer
financial circumstances
-
Facilitating the transfer of
expertise and experience to such farmers through training,
open day and induction initiatives.
-
Offering mentorship assistance to
recipients of these cattle.
-
Preparedness to act as an
advisory resource to the management of state herds.
-
Mobilizing where possible the
involvement of private sector resources in these initiatives.
The importance of this matter is
such that it will be included as a standard agenda item for
future council meetings.
The growing interest in Nguni cattle elsewhere in Africa, and
off this continent is also an issue which requires strategic
attention. The question of structuring cooperation between
breeders and their organizations elsewhere was also discussed,
and this for the foreseeable future will be work in progress.
We note from recent sales, that the demand for our cattle
remains as strong as ever, and that prices remain buoyant. And
each month, we see yet more breeders joining our society. So,
inasmuch as these are positive signs, as council we realize that
the challenges of growth and increased complexity of society
business continue to face us. We believe that as the year
unfolds, we are making progress in bedding down our agreed
strategy, but these things take time and patience. We will
continue to report on progress, and would equally encourage
members to offer feedback where appropriate.
|