|
STRATEGY WORKSHOP – INTERFACE
BETWEEN CLUBS AND SOCIETY
A full day’s workshop was held on 11 September concerning the
relationships between the clubs and society. Apart from the KZN
club, which regrettably could not be represented, all clubs
fielded representatives including the newly formed Kalahari
Club. We believe that this workshop delivered some useful
outcomes. A summary of the process is as follows:
-
The big
picture issue is that society needs input into the diverse
geography of Southern Africa in order to meet certain
objectives, particularly the promotion of the Nguni beef
industry; we cannot run these things from Bloemfontein.
-
A regional
structure of the society is neither affordable, nor desirable
(it would create a new bureaucracy and a “head office”
syndrome).
-
Therefore, it
seems logical to accord responsibilities, functions and
accountability to clubs for managing society business at a
regional level.
-
Until November
2006, clubs were not formally recognized constitutionally.
This changed with the approval of the revised constitution,
but yet with no reference to functions or the relationship
with the society.
-
Beyond sale
organization, clubs, to a greater or lesser degree have played
an important and positive role in breed promotion, training,
and emergent and communal farmer programs.
-
It is
accordingly agreed that clubs should exercise “agency”
functions on behalf of society and for this, they will be
appropriately funded. These functions include:
-
In order to
fulfill this role, a club needs to be formally recognized by
society in respect of the following criteria:
-
The club
constitution meets the guidelines laid down by the society.
-
The club is
deemed to be representative of the society members it serves
in a given area.
-
The club is
willing to carry out agency functions on behalf of the
society.
-
The
chairperson’s report is submitted annually to the council of
the society.
-
Accordingly
the club enjoys representative status at formal society
council meetings.
-
It was agreed
as a matter of policy that club and society membership should
be synonymous, and that all members of society with registered
herds would be required to be primarily a member of that club
closest to where their cattle run.
-
Secondary
membership of clubs in other regions would be at the
discretion of the club concerned.
-
In order to
facilitate the implementation of this policy, it was further
agreed that club membership fees be standardized at R300 per
annum, and that these fees be deducted by the society
concurrently with society membership fees, and paid directly
over to the club concerned.
We believe that this approach is
sustainable and will further the objectives of the society,
whilst remaining non-prescriptive to the extent that clubs
remain flexible and voluntary organizations of society members
with their own identities.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
Firstly, we are pleased to report that Ephraim Matjuda, Cedric
Stoch and Piet Prinsloo have accepted co-option to the council
to advise and help us on the important strategy of developing an
Nguni based beef industry. We look forward to their input as we
pursue this objective.
Giel, our finance minister, presented us with a well reasoned
budget plan for 2008 which takes account of better office
resources, portfolio activities, and the need to allocate moneys
to regional initiatives. We have seen a revenue increase in this
financial year with the growth in membership and cattle numbers,
but it will be necessary, nevertheless, to increase membership
and per capita fees for the year ahead. We are now the largest
breed society member wise, and the second largest cattle wise.
Yet our fees remain well below the breed society average.
Council has accordingly approved this budget which provides that
the membership fee will be increased to R1500.00 per annum, and
the per capita fee to R28.00 per registered animal. Details of
this budget will be reported to the AGM in November.
Portfolio activities were discussed. The following issues are
worth noting:
-
At a technical
level, revised standards for export/import of genetic material
have been agreed in principle, as well as the requirements for
AI bulls and embryo flushing. We realize that the policing and
control is no longer workable and we therefore prefer the
approach where some practical standards are applied, but where
the buyer makes his or her own decision on the basis of
quality information available from the society. These
provisions have been added to the by-law schedules, and are
attached for you information.
-
Naledi is
currently working on the 2008 calendar, and has had some good
submissions so far. She is also planning our presence at NAMPO
next year, which is important if we want to be first league
players. The idea is that clubs will represent our exhibit on
the successive days of the show. We need to gear up to support
this initiative.
-
On the
training front, we intend to launch the proposed program early
in the new year. Club training representatives are invited to
this, and is essentially a critique of the package that will
be a society standard, and will be made available to clubs for
regional training needs.
-
Although our
website is much better, we are not entirely satisfied that it
meets our needs. We recognize that farm phone lines are not
able to process the graphics on this system, and we will be
reviewing this to make the design more user efficient. In the
meantime, our news briefs are intended to keep members updated
on society matters.
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
The AGM of the society is planned for 22nd November
2007, in Bloemfontein. We hope for a good turnout at this
important event, at which we will review developments within the
society over the year to date, and present our plans for next
year.
We will be presenting changes to the constitution primarily
arising out of the club workshop, but also some amendments which
are required to clarify certain points which were missed when
the constitution was revised last year.
We undertook, at the AGM in 2006 to plan the rotation of council
members. We have sought special advice on this matter, and are
advised that the latest version of the constitution applies to
member terms of office (three years). Accordingly, Deon and Giel
will retire at the end of 2008, and of the other four members,
two will retire in 2009 and two in 2010. This allows for
continuity, and also gives us a further year to bed down the
strategic plan as a cohesive council team. You will be aware
that council continues to operate with only five of the six
positions filled. In terms of the constitution and the process
laid out therein, a new council member needs to be elected at
the AGM.
The annual general meeting is really a formal meeting governed
by the constitution. In order to better inform society members
on what is happening within our society and in the broader
external environment, we plan to convene a half day symposium
the day before the AGM. Details of speakers and topics will be
advised in due course. This event replaces the traditional
inspectors’ meeting which will be convened early in the new
year.
INSPECTORS’ CONFERENCE
The important role that our inspectors play in improving our
breed, and as society ambassadors, is such that we believe that
a special gathering of inspectors is needed, undistracted from
AGM issues. Early in the new year, before the annual round of
inspections, we plan to hold an inspectors’ conference dedicated
to technical breed matters and other issues involving the
inspection process. A venue and date will be decided to
encourage maximum participation in this important event.
Schedule X
Requirements for donors of semen destined for transfer, sale
or export
|
Herd book section |
Must be registered
as SP |
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
Must be registered in the name of an active member or belong
to a recognised A.I. station |
|
|
|
|
Data
verification |
The society
shall reasonably ensure the accuracy and completeness of all
the bulls’ pedigree, progeny and production data, but does
not restrict itself to the accreditation of bulls with
official BLUP figures, as it does not have a policy of
compulsory “performance testing”. |
|
|
|
|
Inspection
|
(a) Bull
must have been approved by at least two inspectors
specifically appointed by the society (at least one of which
should always be a senior) and score an average of ≥ 5 with
not more than one score of ≤ 4 on the official score sheet
at a special inspection held for this purpose.
(b) Must display
no signs of genetic or chromosomal defects |
|
|
|
|
DNA profiling |
The DNA profile
must indicate purity and the LidCat number must be
registered |
|
|
|
|
Legal |
All other relevant
legal requirements, as prescribed by the Act, must be
adhered to, including all veterinary requirements such as
the submission of “Schedule O” forms |
Schedule Y
Requirements for donors of embryos destined for transfer,
sale or export
|
Herd book section |
Donor must be
registered as Appendix B or SP |
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
Donor must
be registered in the name of an active member |
|
|
|
|
Data
Verification |
The society
shall reasonably ensure the accuracy and completeness of all
the donor’s pedigree, progeny and production data, but does
not restrict itself to the accreditation of donors with
official BLUP figures, as it does not have a policy of
compulsory “performance testing”. |
|
|
|
|
Inspection |
Donor cows
must have been approved by at least two inspectors
specifically appointed by the society (at least one of which
should always be a senior) at a special inspection held for
this purpose. |
|
|
|
|
DNA
profiling |
The DNA
profile must indicate purity and the LidCat number must be
registered |
|
|
|
|
Legal |
All other relevant
legal requirements, as prescribed by the Act, must be
adhered to, including all veterinary requirements such as
the submission of “Schedule O” forms |
|